Cone snails are venomous marine gastropods that hydraulically propel a hollow, chitinous radular harpoon into prey. This radular harpoon serves both as projectile and conduit for venom delivery. In the fish-hunting cone snail Conus catus, the radular harpoon is also utilized to tether the snail to its prey, rapidly paralyzed by neuroexcitatory peptides. Effective prey capture in C. catus requires both fast-acting neurotoxins and a delivery system quick enough to exceed the prey fish’s rapid escape responses. In a newly published paper, "The high speed radular prey strike of a fish-hunting cone snail," Biology Prof. Joseph Schulz and his co-authors, including Oxy undergrad collaborators, Ian Jan '20 and Gerleen Sangha '17, report here that the cone snail’s prey strike is one of the fastest in the animal kingdom. A unique cellular latch mechanism prevents harpoon release until sufficient pressure builds and overcomes the forces of the latch, resulting in rapid acceleration into prey. The radular harpoon then rapidly decelerates as its bulbous base reaches the end of the proboscis, a distensible hydrostatic skeleton extended toward the prey, with little slowing during prey impalement. The velocities achieved are the fastest movements of any mollusk and exceed previous estimates by over an order of magnitude.
In an anonymous IRB-approved study of ~1100 participants across 14 STEM fields from 46 countries, Biology Prof. Amber Stubler's new paper, "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM," investigated the pervasiveness and long-term implications of receiving unprofessional comments as an author during peer review. Over half of the respondents indicated that they had received an unprofessional review at some point during their career. When evaluating the impacts of these reviews on the authors' perceived scientific aptitude, productivity, and career advancement, clear differences between groups were found. White men were the least likely to doubt their scientific aptitude or experience lower productivity after receiving an unprofessional review relative to underrepresented groups in STEM (men of color, white women and white non-binary people and women of color and non-binary people of color). Women of color and non-binary people of color were the most likely to perceive delays in career advancement, and their experience differed significantly from white women and non-binary people of color, highlighting how important it is to evaluate intersectionality (Crenshaw 1991) in these types of studies. This new study demonstrates that the content of peer reviews passed along to authors may be an additional barrier to equity in STEM fields. (Note: the article quickly created a stir on Twitter and was picked up by the news. See, for example, this article.)
The ubiquitous use of high stakes tests in K-12 schools in the United States has a deleterious effect on students of color (e.g., Black and Latino). Punitive policies related to test outcomes, such as retention and graduation, have been particularly damaging. In fact, the historical use of tests has been linked to exclusionary and racist motives resulting in discriminatory practices in college admissions while leading to genetic and cultural deficit theories to explain low achievement for students of color. Education Prof. Ronald W. Solorzano's new article, "High stakes testing and educational inequality in K-12," explains how the legacy of these early uses of tests has maintained its adverse presence in today’s educational landscape. National data on grade retention, high school dropout rates, and achievement indicate that students of color are disproportionately penalized by school-based policies resulting in an unequal educational experience. Unfortunately, these trends have been persistent reflecting achievement gaps between White and Asian students and Latino and Black students, and where, in most cases, no meaningful progress in eliminating these gaps has been made. English learners are particularly harmed by these policies and tests since language and opportunity to learn (OTL) concerns persist. Trends of low achievement are attributed to poorly resourced schools, cultural deficit theories employed by school personnel, and the invalid use of tests. Schools could serve students better by employing a curriculum and instruction that is culturally and linguistically relevant, that integrates communities and schools to critically analyze their educational and social-political status and agency thus empowering both for lasting change. Furthermore, teachers need to be empowered to be instructional leaders who critically evaluate their curriculum and instruction so as to educate and liberate students of color.
MAC Prof. Allison de Fren's scholarly video essay Mad Science/Mad Love and the Female Body in Pieces (2018) examines a sub-genre of the Frankenstein film in which a mad doctor attempts to revive a disfigured/dead daughter/fiancée by stealing parts from female victims. As the video demonstrates, the (often unmet) critical potential of such films is their narrative condensation of the part-for-whole logic through which female bodies are often represented in the media. [Followup: de Fren’s video essay was included in Sight&Sound's best video essays of 2019 list!]
Some contend that politics functions best when deference is given to tradition and authoritative community norms, while others argue for the importance of independent thought and doubt about received sources of authority. Insight into this question can be found in the work of Alexis de Tocqueville. While Tocqueville is often taken to regard the doubt characteristic of intellectual independence solely as a pathology, Politics Prof. Alec Arellano's new article, "Tocqueville on Intellectual Independence, Doubt, and Democratic Citizenship," shows that he also saw it as a potential precursor to conversation, a stimulus to self-assured conviction, and a counter to distortionary abstractions. Nonetheless, Tocqueville also elaborates the destructive outcomes of too much doubt and intellectual independence. Arellano identifies the ways in which Tocqueville seeks to discipline and educate the drive to independent thought so as to attain its benefits without falling victim to its pathologies. (Note: This article builds on the scholarship of the late Politics Prof. Roger Boesche.)
DWA Prof. Phillip Ayoub published published an article and an essay in the second half of 2019:
- The emergence of gay rights as a salient political issue in global politics leads DWA Prof. Phillip Ayoub and co-author Douglas Page to ask, “Who is empowered to be politically active in various societies?” What current research misses is a comparison of levels of participation (voting and protesting) between states that make stronger and weaker appeals to homophobia. In their article, "When Do Opponents of Gay Rights Mobilize? Explaining Political Participation in Times of Backlash against Liberalism"--an analysis of survey data from Europe and Latin America--they argue that the alignment between the norms of sexuality a state promotes and an individual’s personal attitudes on sexuality increases felt political efficacy. They find that individuals who are tolerant of homosexuality are more likely to participate in states with gay-friendly policies in comparison with intolerant individuals. The reverse also holds: individuals with low education levels that are intolerant of homosexuality are more likely to participate in states espousing political homophobia.
- Ayoub's "Logics of Gender Justice and Their Meaning for the Study of Sexuality and Gender Identity: A Dialogue" dialogues with Htun and Weldon's exceptional new book, The Logics of Gender Justice, as it relates to LGBTI rights. Beyond engaging the authors' questions of when and why governments promote women's rights, Ayoub also engage their argument that equality is not one issue but many linked issues, including issues of sexuality and gender identity. His own reflections on their work thus address the contributions the book makes to the study of political science, as well as open questions about how their logic of gender justice might apply across other issue areas less explored in the book. Htun and Weldon's own definition of gender justice also rightly includes space for LGBTQI people, which he sees as an invitation to think through the typology in relation to these communities.
Geologic records of past earthquakes are rare but critical for identifying long-term patterns in fault behavior and assessing modern earthquake hazards. In a new paper, "Paleoseismic evidence for climatic and magmatic controls on the Teton fault, WY," Geology Prof. Darren Larsen and co-authors (including Oxy undergrad, Aria Blum '19) present a continuous 14,000-year paleoearthquake reconstruction using precisely dated lacustrine sediments and landslide deposits from a lake basin positioned directly on the Teton normal fault, which cuts across Grand Teton National Park, WY, and is among the most hazardous intraplate faults in the western US. They show that beginning immediately after deglaciation, a series of at least seven major fault ruptures occurred at regular intervals of ~1,050 years (± ~250 years), followed by >5,000 years of inactivity. These results are consistent with trench data and model simulations and suggest faulting was variably influenced by climate-controlled glacial fluctuations and magmatic activity of the nearby Yellowstone hotspot.
In a new article, "Neither Penalized nor Prized: Feminist Legislators, Women's Representation, or Career Paths in Argentina," Politics Prof. Jennifer M. Piscopo and coauthor Mariana Caminotti compare the career paths and policy priorities of women and men elected to the Argentine Congress. Conventional wisdom suggests that women legislators who represent feminist policy areas will find their career options curtailed by party leaders. However, they find that feminist lawmakers are not punished by party leaders for their feminist views -- but neither are they rewarded. Feminist women legislators face the same inequalities in their careers as non-feminist women, indicating that gendered barriers persist, but that these barriers are not tied to particular policy priorities.
It is known via work of Duke and Ghate that there are only finitely many pairs of full level, degree one eigenforms f and g whose product fg is also an eigenform. In a newly published paper, "Eigenform product identities for degree two Siegel modular forms," Math Prof. Jim Brown and co-authors prove a partial generalization of this theorem for degree two Siegel modular forms. Namely, they show that there is only one pair of eigenforms F and G such that FG is a non-cuspidal eigenform. In the case that FG is a cuspform, they provide necessary conditions for FG to be an eigenform, give one example, and conjecture that is the only example.
This year Psychology Prof. Andrea Hopmeyer published three articles.
- Although peer crowd affiliations have been studied among emerging adults in college, this work has yet to focus in on LGBT-identifying students. Accordingly, Prof. Hopmeyer's current study, "Protester, Partygoer, or Simply Playing It Down? The Impact of Crowd Affiliations on LGBT Emerging Adults’ Socioemotional and Academic Adjustment to College," a) surveyed the peer crowd landscape using a sample of 234 LGBT students (Mage = 19.89, SD = 1.55; 70.51% female, 18.38% male, 11.11% other) at a small, private, liberal arts college in Southern California, and b) explored the relationships between self-reported peer crowd affiliations and LGBT students’ adjustment (i.e., loneliness, belongingness, and academic-, alcohol-, drug-, and sex-risk behaviors). Results point to the existence of four underlying peer crowd dimensions among LGBT students: protester, nonvocal, social, and athletic. Furthermore, affiliation with these peer crowds was found to relate to students’ self-reported loneliness and academic-, drug-, and sex-risk behaviors.
- Social media platforms and instant messaging applications have a widespread presence in today’s secondary schools. However, the implications of these ubiquitous communication technologies for adolescent’s social functioning with peers and academic competence in the classroom are not well understood. In fact, research on adolescents’ digital lives has only rarely incorporated direct assessments of adjustment in school environments. Prof. Hopmeyer's study, "Distinct Modalities of Electronic Communication and School Adjustment," addressed these limitations with a school-based data collection. 376 adolescents (Mage = 14.4; 209 girls; including 29.2% Latino/Hispanic, 27.3% White, 28.2% mixed) were recruited from an urban high school and followed for one year. Social reputations were indexed via peer nominations and electronic communication tendencies were assessed using self-report questionnaires. Grade point averages, disciplinary events, and attendance data were obtained from school records. On a cross-sectional basis, frequent use of fashionable social networks (i.e., Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter) was associated with popular-aggressive social reputations, poor achievement, and rule-breaking behavior. E-mail use, in contrast, was associated with academic competence. Longitudinal analyses were less conclusive because the examined constructs were highly stable across the period of data collection. The full pattern of findings indicates that electronic communication patterns can be a powerful marker of academic and social functioning at school.
- Although previous research has clearly demonstrated the impact that peer crowd affiliation has on socio-emotional and risk-related outcomes, very few studies have investigated this relation in samples of emerging adults, and even fewer have focused specifically on commuter college students. Accordingly, Prof. Hopmeyer's study, "Commuter College Student Adjustment: Peer Crowd Affiliation as a Driver of Loneliness, Belongingness, and Risk Behaviors," aimed to fill this gap in the literature by exploring the relationship between peer crowds and college adjustment at a commuter school. Participants were 663 students at a large public university in Southern California (campus population of 92% commuters). Factor analytic results indicated the presence of four crowd dimensions on campus: (a) social/partiers, (b) creatives and activists, (c) campus active, and (d) international students. Furthermore, path analysis results indicated that these crowd dimensions predict loneliness, college belongingness, and risk behaviors. Overall, the results of this study indicate the presence of a peer crowd landscape unique to commuter schools that has important implications for student adjustment.
In a newly published paper, "Academic Achievement Across the Day: Evidence from Randomized Class Schedules," Economics Prof. Kevin Williams and his co-author study the optimal organization of a school day with respect to the timing and structure of student's daily schedules. They analyze five cohorts of students at a higher education institution which includes data on over 180,000 student-course outcomes. They show that expected performance of two students taking the same class at the same time of day may differ by as much as 0.15 standard deviations, simply due to their prior schedules that day. They show that prioritizing certain student schedules could be equivalent to improving their teacher quality by 0.33 of a standard deviation.
Psychology and Cognitive Science Prof. Andrew Shtulman recently published three essays.
- Research from developmental psychology, cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience reveals that people readily endorse multiple explanations of the same phenomena, even when those explanations are logically incompatible. In a new chapter, "Why do logically incompatible explanations seem psychologically compatible? Science, pseudoscience, religion, and superstition" Prof. Shtulman and his co-author discusses cases of non-scientific explanations coexisting with scientific ones. They ;explore a range of nonscientific explanations, including religious explanations (e.g., attributing illness to God), superstitious explanations (e.g., attributing illness to witchcraft), and pseudoscientific explanations (e.g., attributing illness to behaviors unrelated to germs). We argue that the ubiquity of coexisting explanations across cultures and domains implies that coexistence is an inherent feature of conceptual representations and a regular impediment to understanding science. We conclude by considering several questions about the origin and dynamics of coexistence that may shed further light on our understanding and acceptance of scientific explanations.
- Why are some scientific ideas particularly difficult to grasp? Atoms, germs, heat, inertia, heliocentrism, natural selection, continental drift : these ideas were slow to develop in the history of science and remain slow to develop in the minds of individuals, but the reasons for the historical delay are not necessarily the same as the reasons for the cognitive delay. Scientists and students have different explanatory goals, different empirical concerns, and different background assumptions. In a newly published chapter, "Doubly counterintuitive: Cognitive obstacles to the discovery and the learning of scientific ideas and why they often differ," Prof. Shtulman aims to show how these factors can render the same idea counterintuitive for different reasons. This comparison of scientists’ and students’ conceptual ecologies has implications not only for theories of scientific knowledge but also for the practice of teaching science to nonscientists.
- Belief in supernatural beings is widespread across cultures, but the properties of those beings vary from one culture to another. The supernatural beings that are part of Hinduism, for instance, are represented as human-like, whereas those that are part of Islam are represented more abstractly. In a newly published paper, "When Allah meets Ganesha: Developing supernatural concepts in a religiously diverse society," Prof. Shtulman and co-authors explore how children exposed to both types of representations conceptualize the relevant beings. They administered several measures of anthropomorphism to Hindu and Muslim children (n = 124) from a religiously-diverse community in India. Participants consistently anthropomorphized fictional beings (ghosts and fairies) and Hindu beings (Ganesha and Krishna) but varied in their anthropomorphization of Islamic beings (Muhammad, Allah). Younger participants (aged 8 to 11) anthropomorphized Islamic beings more than older participants (aged 12 to 15), and Hindu participants anthropomorphized them more than Muslim participants. These findings suggest that children initially anthropomorphize supernatural beings but can learn to conceptualize them more abstractly if encouraged by cultural input. They also suggest that abstract conceptions of divine agents are not a universal endpoint in the development of religious cognition.
History Prof. Lisa Sousa’s chapter titled “Flowers and Speech in Discourses on Deviance in Book 10” was published in The Florentine Codex: An Encyclopedia of the Nahua World in Sixteenth-Century Mexico. The Florentine Codex is a 12-volume work on Nahua (Aztec) society, religion, political history, and the natural history of central Mexico written and illustrated in the mid-sixteenth century by Nahua noblemen under the direction of a Spanish friar, Bernardino de Sahagún. The article argues that the Nahuatl text, Spanish translation, and indigenous pictorials in the book on society reveal three distinct discourses on deviance. In both the Nahuatl-language texts and images of social deviants, speech and flowers are metaphors for illicit sexuality and immorality, more generally, but these pervasive, powerful Nahua symbols are glossed over in the Spanish translation. When the Nahuatl texts, Spanish translations, and images are read against one another, they reveal how multiple understandings of immorality operated in the early colonial period, and how writers and artists employed a variety of strategies to convey moral danger.
DWA Prof. Anthony Tirado Chase's opening chapter to The Organization of Islamic Cooperation and Human Rights (Peterson and Kayaoglu, eds.) presents a theoretical and conceptual framework for analyzing and understanding the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and human rights. Will the OIC’s engagement with human rights advance human rights in the Muslim world or are these efforts a problematic strategy to co-opt or even subvert human rights? And, more broadly, what does the OIC’s engagement with human rights say about the ways in which human rights norms are independently affected by international organizations, either positively or negatively? The argument that follows is that an international organization such as the OIC, dominated by conservative, authoritarian states, is unlikely to create political opportunity structures to advance human rights. Indeed, the OIC’s record shows that, if it has had any independent impact on human rights at all, the effect has been to galvanize regional and international opposition to human rights expansion, particularly in domains of sexuality and economic rights.
BiologyProf. Gretchen North and several Occidental students, past and present, are coauthors on two articles published recently, both based at least in part on research conducted at La Selva Biological Station in the rain forest of Costa Rica. The first study, "Disentangling changes in the spectral shape of chlorophyll fluorescence: Implications for remote sensing of photosynthesis," involved leaf-level measurements of photosynthesis and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from tropical trees as well as other plant species, and the second study, "Hydraulic conductance, resistance, and resilience: how leaves of a tropical epiphyte respond to drought," used anatomical, physiological, and genetic methods to analyze pathways of water movement through leaves of a tank bromeliad during drought and recovery.
Political parties act as gatekeepers, meaning that electing more women depends on parties’ willingness to nominate women candidates. In a new study by Prof. Jennifer Piscopo (Politics), "Women to the Rescue: The Gendered Effects of Public Discontent on Legislative Nominations in Latin America," she and her co-authors highlight how, when parties make nomination decisions in times of public discontent, women's nominations increase. They theorize that parties hold similar biases to voters: gender stereotypes that regard women as more trustworthy and honest should advantage women as political trust falls and perceptions of corruption rise. Using two waves of data from over 100 political parties in 18 Latin American countries, they find that parties nominate more women when a large proportion of the public distrusts the national legislature.
History Prof. Sasha Day's "Peasant" chapter of Afterlives of Chinese Communism traces the development of the historical and political category "peasant" in China. Emerging out of a complex set of often contradictory images of the peasant, a peasant dialectic developed during the Chinese revolution, which explained the conditions under which peasants were either conservative or progressive. Following the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949, this dialectic began to breakdown. By the 1980s, a liberal reversal of the peasant dialectic became dominant, setting the stage for discrimination against rural migrants during the Reform Period.
In their recently published chapter "Nonideal theory, self-respect, and preimplantation genetic technologies," Philosophy Prof. Clair Morrissey and Elena Neale (Philosophy and Psychology, ‘20) suggest a fuller understanding of the obligation to respect patient autonomy can be gained by recognizing patients as historically and socially situated agents, whose values are developed, challenged, and changed, rather than merely applied, in their decision-making about their use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis or preimplantation genetic screening (PGD/PGS). They ground this discussion in empirical research on the patients’ experiences with these genetic technologies, and suggest that promoting patients’ self-respect is a important ethical standard for PGD/PGS providers and practices to recognize.
Prof. Julie Prebel (Writing & Rhetoric)published a chapter titled "Richard Wright's Black Boy: Black Consciousness, Artistic Expression, and Social Justice" in an edited collection on Wright. Prebel's chapter focuses on Wright's autobiography, which chronicles his experiences as a child in the south and his migration north where he begins his writing career, as she shows how Wright's narrative highlights the effects of white supremacy experienced by blacks -- particularly on the development of consciousness and identity. Prebel argues that writing becomes the means through which Wright enacts self-representation, resists racial oppression, and emphasizes the necessity of social justice for blacks.
American Studies Prof. Courtney R. Baker's essay, "The Loud Silence of Monuments," was published in the spring edition of the online journal Dilettante Army. The essay considers monuments such as those commemorating the Confederacy as speech acts in the public sphere and how current artists are using scale to provide redress.
It is difficult to interpret air quality measures, such as the source of a measured exposure, in areas burdened by multiple sources of pollution or cumulative impacts. In their pilot study, "Distance decay gradients in hazardous air pollution concentrations around oil and natural gas facilities in the city of Los Angeles," Prof. Bhavna Shamasunder (UEP) and co-authors were able to identify several volatile organic compounds that have been linked with oil development operations. This research is a start to help better determine the air pollution burden that oil development operations pose in densely populated, environmental justice neighborhoods such as South Los Angeles.
In the United States, 1 out of 4 babies is born at a designated "Baby-Friendly" hospital. However, recent popular press has critiqued "Baby-Friendly" birth practices as failing mothers. In her recent article, "Understanding the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: A Multi-Disciplinary Analysis," Prof. Erica Preston-Roedder (Philosophy) collaborates with historians and philosophers to contextualize these critiques. While Baby-Friendly practices do fail mothers in certain respects, these same policies are rooted in a tradition of supporting and empowering women. Their article demonstrates how liberatory intentions, when institutionalized by hospitals and other forces, can have unforeseen consequences.
Prof. Kristi Upson-Saia (Religious Studies) published a new article, "Gregory of Nyssa on Virginity, Gardens, and the Enclosure of the Παράδεισος" in which she analyzes Gregory's treatise on virginity--and the broader custom of calling ascetic woman a "garden enclosed"--alongside the study of Romans' material garden spaces. Upson-Saia suggests that Gregory capitalized on common views about the supernatural flourishing and everlasting bounty of gardens in order to amplify his argument that virginity, and the Christian garden paradise, served as a limit or boundary to corruption and death. She further argues that Gregory stationed the Christian virgin at the enclosure of the παράδεισος as a replacement of the conventional garden guardian, Priapus, who was known for his permanently erect phallus and his violent sexual threats against those who trespassed into the garden. This juxtaposition pit the asexuality of Christian virginity against the hypersexuality of the “pagan” demi-god and highlighted virginity's role in admitting outsiders into the utopic space over against Priapus's role of restricting access.
Profs. John Liu (Sociology) and Yating Chuang (Economics) collected a comprehensive list of twenty-seven introductory economics textbooks in the United States and analyzed their coverage of climate change. Their finding, published in an article titled "Climate Change and Economics 101: Teaching the Greatest Market Failure," show that all texts conceptualize climate change as a problem of carbon emission’s negative externalities and the preferred market-based solutions. Somewhat alarmingly, a small subset of texts deviates from the scientific consensus on the human causes of climate change. Liu and Chuang also provide suggestions for economics educators to innovate the current introductory curriculum to better cope with the climate crisis.
Prof. Kelema Lee Moses (Art & Art History) published an exhibition review in The Contemporary Pacific for the show, Holo Moana: Generations of Oceanic Voyaging. The show, housed in the Joseph M. Long Gallery at the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, covered a lot of territory: embracing and disseminating indigenous knowledge, exploring the ways in which cultural exchange allows communities to gain a deeper understanding about themselves and the world, and examining the impact of technology on tradition and culture. Moses argues that that the show succeeded in critically “re-awakening, re-activating, and re-envisioning” wayfinding as a means of bringing attention to what Oceanic knowledge teaches us about the Earth and its people.
In a new article, "Vintage Birds, Modern Science," in Birding Magazine, Prof. John McCormack (Biology) explains in plain language how the bird specimens in the Moore Lab are helping to answer pressing environmental questions involving habitat alteration and climate change.
Prof. Jake Mackey’s (CSLC) new article, “Developmental psychology in the Roman world: continuity and change,” attempts to revise a common view among ancient historians to the effect that Romans ignored children’s cognitive ontogeny, perceiving early childhood as a largely undifferentiated life stage. Prof. Mackey presents evidence from over four hundred years of Roman writing to make three points against Roman neglect of children. First, a consensus about “developmental psychology” prevailed from the late republic to late antiquity. Second, this consensus is consistent with modern findings and theories. The Roman material maps onto a developmental timeline featuring a “2-month revolution,” when the infant engages in dyadic protoconversations with adults, and a “9-month revolution,” when the infant shares attention triadically with adults toward third objects. In the Roman consensus, both dyadic protoconversations and triadic joint attention were central to cultural learning. Third, when the Roman consensus about children’s minds did change, it was because of the Christian doctrine of original sin, according to which even newborns were psychologically corrupt.
In urban low-income Los Angeles neighborhoods, children have very few opportunities to engage in physical activity outside of the school campus. Additionally, a majority of play surfaces at Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) schools are asphalt with minimal tree canopy coverage. Kinesiology Prof. Marci Raney published a new article, "Physical Activity and Social Behaviors of Urban Children in Green Playgrounds," that presents the results from a 3-year study conducted at Title 1 LAUSD elementary schools after a large-scale schoolyard greening project at one location. Results from the first longitudinal multi-method controlled research study of schoolyard greening suggest that replacing large areas of asphalt with green space may be an effective way to improve physical activity levels and social interactions, particularly for girls and older students who are typically the least likely to meet federal physical activity guidelines. Read more in the press release linked here.
Mathematics Prof. Ron Buckmire's new article, "A Survey of Significant Developments in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Over the Past Decade," appeared in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society. (The Notices is the signature publication of the American Mathematical Society, and goes out to roughly 30,000 subscribers monthly.)
The article is a summary of relatively recent developments in undergraduate mathematics education--describing various pedagogical innovations, demographic changes, expanding career options and new curricular pathways--that mathematics researchers may not be aware of. Prof. Buckmire disseminates information about exciting and innovative projects that he became aware of as part of his work at the National Science Foundation's Division of Undergraduate Education from 2016 to 2018, curating responses to the question "What are the most significant results, events, or developments in undergraduate mathematics education of the last decade?" provided by recognized experts in the field.
A special dialogue section of the journal Politics, Groups, and Identities was devoted to DWA Prof. Philip Ayoub’s book, When States Come Out: Europe’s Sexual Minorities and the Politics of Visibility. The five articles, with a response from Prof. Ayoub, address a few core themes, including the artificial gulf between research on LGBT politics in the US and outside it; the complexities of the “coming out” repertoire; the pressures of EU accession; and the theory’s applicability to non-LGBT groups (including regressive groups), to other issues (e.g., sex worker rights and abortion), and to contemporary events (e.g., Brexit and anti-immigration populism in Europe). These themes also touch on issues of nationalism, religious-nationalism, and homonationalism as they relate to political science.
